Tuesday, May 19th, 2026

SEE postponement: Some 482,707 students would have been writing exams now



KATHMANDU: Had the government not postponed the Secondary Education Examination (SEE) examination scheduled to be conducted from today, a total of 482,707 students would have been sitting for the exams in 1,995 centers throughout the country.

The National Examinations Board, Office of the Controller of Examinations had informed all preparations for the exam had been complete. The exam were scheduled to conclude on March 30.

A meeting of the high-level committee led by Deputy Prime Minister Ishwor Pokhrel on Wednesday evening, however, decided to postpone the SEE scheduled to be held from today owing to coronavirus fears.

According to Ramraj Khakurel, Controller of the Examinations, some 9,509 students were appearing the exam towards the technical stream.

Similarly, 16,242 students were supposed to appear in the exams in a bid to improve their grades.

While the highest number of students — 13,667 — was from the Bagmati State, the lowest number — 36,436 — was from the Karnali State.

According to Khakurel, some 5.1 million sets of question papers had been printed for a total of 86 subjects and they had been delivered to all the districts.

Some 65,000 workforce would set to be mobilized to conduct the exams.

Publish Date : 19 March 2020 08:16 AM

Nepal Bar Association to stage symbolic lantern protest

KATHMANDU: The Nepal Bar Association and other legal professionals are

Jumla administration warns of action against illegal river mining

JUMLA: The District Administration Office in Jumla has warned of

Parliamentary hearing committee proceeds with chief justice hearing despite opposition objections

KATHMANDU: The first meeting of the Parliamentary Hearing Committee convened

Opposition lawmakers object to rushed hearing schedule for proposed chief justice

KATHMANDU: Opposition lawmakers have strongly objected to the schedule set

UML objects to fast-track hearing on proposed chief justice

KATHMANDU: The CPN-UML has objected to what it called an