KATHMANDU: As the process of forming a new government moves forward, a parallel debate has intensified within the CPN-UML over who should lead its parliamentary party. Amid growing calls for leadership renewal, many within the party are advocating for a younger face, particularly someone with strong legal expertise, to take charge.
While senior leader Balen Shah of the Rastriya Swatantra Party prepares to take the oath as Prime Minister on Friday, other political parties are busy finalizing their parliamentary leadership structures. Within UML, names such as Suhang Nembang, elected from Ilam-2, Vice Chair Ram Bahadur Thapa ‘Badal’, Ain Mahar, and Secretary Padma Aryal have surfaced in discussions.
Among them, Suhang Nembang is increasingly viewed as a strong candidate, particularly due to his legal background. Many believe his leadership could strengthen UML’s presence in Parliament. Against this backdrop, Nembang spoke to Kahabarhub about the leadership race, the role of UML in the new government, and broader party dynamics.
Excerpts:
What kind of discussions are taking place within the party regarding the selection of the parliamentary party leader?
There may be discussions happening within the party, but I haven’t been directly involved or informed yet. Since the party chair is currently in mourning, this issue may not have formally entered the discussion stage.
Is your name being discussed for the role because of your own interest, or is it just speculation?
The parliamentary party leader represents the entire party. I’m grateful for the goodwill shown by young people and on social media. If senior leaders believe I am suited to the current needs and assign me this responsibility, I will not hesitate. However, it doesn’t have to be me—if any capable young leader is brought forward, I will fully support them.
So you are not making an open claim for the position?
Respecting our senior leaders, we should wait for the decision that comes from their discussions. If they bring me forward, as I said, I won’t step back. Our seniors understand the importance of youth leadership and the current needs of the party. It would be positive if the younger generation is given an opportunity. It doesn’t have to be me—but if youth are promoted, I will support them. That would benefit the party and reflect a commitment to change.
As a law student, the role would require strict adherence to legal procedures. Are you confident you can handle that responsibility?
I am fully confident in my ability to work. I have always fulfilled the responsibilities given to me, and I believe I can also successfully handle the role of parliamentary party leader.
There is a constitutional practice of assigning the Deputy Speaker position to the opposition. Has there been any discussion on this?
There has been no discussion on that yet. These issues will likely be addressed after the parliamentary party leader is selected and members of the House of Representatives take their oath. As for other roles like chief whip and whips, I am not aware of any discussions so far.
Even though the party chair is in mourning, do you think responsibilities should have been delegated to move things forward?
There is still time, so I believe decisions will be made thoughtfully. I remain hopeful.
How do you see UML presenting itself in Parliament? Will it be more challenging than before?
It’s not necessarily more challenging than before. Each member enters Parliament with an individual vision—focused on both their constituency and the nation. Since all lawmakers aim to serve the country and the people, the distinction between ruling and opposition parties should not hinder cooperation. If the government works in the interest of the people and the country, UML, even as the opposition, will support it. Where there are shortcomings, we will provide constructive feedback and hold them accountable.
What are your expectations from the new government?
Many laws and regulations already exist to guide the country’s progress, but there are minor flaws that need correction. We are ready to support efforts to fix those issues and strengthen the system. Rather than opposing for the sake of opposition, there should be meaningful dialogue between the ruling and opposition sides. The government must deliver results that people can actually feel. Citizens should experience the presence of a responsible and supportive government. Fixing legal and regulatory weaknesses should also be a priority.
There is growing debate about leadership change within political parties, including UML. What is your view on this?
While respecting senior leaders, there is a need to guide the party in a positive direction. I am confident that the party will make proper use of the energy of the youth. Our leadership understands both the expectations of the people and the needs of the party. I believe they are preparing to move forward in line with public aspirations.
Comment