Think about how photography has evolved: from waiting for black-and-white prints for days to instantly creating animations with today’s AI. It brought design convenience into the hands of humans through generative AI, saving the expense of hiring human designers and empowering small businesses to use AI instead.
Just as designing, once a skill for specialists, coding is also facing disruption now. AI can write and fix code within seconds. And Mark Zuckerberg, earlier in 2025, predicted AI would soon handle 50% of development at Meta by 2026.
This rapid automation explains why Geoffrey Hinton, often referred to as the “Godfather of AI,” has warned that machines could one day surpass human learning and adaptability. As we get closer to that moment, curiosity will rise: “When will humans begin learning AI seriously—not just as a college major, but as a basic skill?” The answer lies in when both developed and developing nations upgrade their education systems.
A Nationwide Policy Shift
China, unsurprisingly, is already outpacing the rest of the world in this regard. Rather than merely hosting conferences on AI education, the country is implementing it from the ground up. Artificial intelligence is no longer confined to scientists and corporations; it is being introduced to young children in their classrooms.
On May 12, 2025, the Ministry of Education mandated the nationwide integration of AI into all primary and secondary school curricula, effective September 1, 2025. This move was supported by two key policy documents: the Guidelines for AI General Education in Primary and Secondary Schools and the Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI in Primary and Secondary Schools.
Professional development programs can be scaled efficiently across the country, and pilot projects initiated in top-tier schools can be refined and expanded nationwide. Perhaps most importantly, China’s vast and interconnected education system, which serves over 200 million students, acts as a powerful amplifier; successful reforms in one region can rapidly influence others and even shape global standards.
Together, these policies establish a formal structure to ensure students learn to understand, use, and create with AI responsibly and creatively from a young age.
The government designed an age-appropriate and cumulative curriculum. In primary school, students are introduced to foundational concepts: what AI is, where they encounter it in daily life (such as in voice assistants and photo-editing apps), and how to use it safely.
By junior high, the focus shifts to building logical and creative skills through basic coding and hands-on projects. Finally, in senior high, students engage with larger concepts like systems-level thinking and project design, including the supervised use of generative AI tools.
To ensure compliance, the policy mandates that schools in Beijing, for instance, conduct a minimum of eight hours of AI instruction annually.
The government has also established strict guidelines for using generative AI tools. While primary school students are prohibited from independent use, older students in secondary and higher secondary schools may only use them under direct teacher supervision.
Teachers, in turn, are cautioned against letting AI replace their instruction. Together, these measures are designed to help students explore new ideas while safeguarding their ability to think independently.
Nepal’s AI Reality Check
In stark contrast, Nepal’s approach to technology in education remains in its primitive stages. While the integration of basic coding languages like C, C++, or Python has been discussed in recent years, the curriculum lacks a practical, application-based focus that would allow students to use these skills to solve real-life problems in the community.
Similarly, the current conversation around AI is narrow—often limited to the use of tools like ChatGPT and Perplexity AI, and, within academia, reduced to policing whether students have used AI for assignments.
There is an urgency for a more substantive discussion, highlighted by the rapid speed of this technology. Consider this: while Facebook took around four years and six months to reach a hundred million users, ChatGPT achieved the same milestone in just two months.
In Nepal, where these tools have gained significant popularity, the focus must shift from mere access to structured education on their ethical and practical application.
AI’s potential extends far beyond writing essays for assignments or generating images; it is a powerful tool that can help teachers and students with advanced research, data analysis, personalized learning, and even the exploration of immersive technologies like AR and VR.
In China, this vision is already being implemented. Guangdong Province has made AI courses mandatory every two weeks for senior high school students.
The guidelines also outline clear age-based permissions: younger children cannot use open-ended AI tools unsupervised, middle schoolers may analyze AI outputs, and high schoolers can conduct research. This structured approach is designed to maximize learning while protecting students from overdependence, privacy risks, and misuse.
The Digital Divide
In Nepal, however, the path toward AI education is challenged by two fundamental obstacles: a lack of expertise and a deep digital divide. Most teachers and students lack the training and experience to integrate AI effectively into teaching and learning.
This knowledge gap is compounded by a severe infrastructure deficit; many rural schools lack reliable internet, modern computers, and, in some cases, even stable electricity. It is not uncommon for a government school to have a single, outdated computer lab shared by hundreds of students, rendering the prospect of AI education a distant dream.
Furthermore, the issue of access is not a simple urban-rural binary. Significant disparities exist within communities, where a family’s geographical location and financial background create vastly different levels of access to the necessary devices, networks, and technical skills.
China, of course, faces its own implementation challenges, though on a smaller scale. A primary concern is curriculum overload; integrating AI effectively without balancing the workload risks burdening both students and teachers.
Secondly, the nature of AI as a subject poses a fundamental assessment problem: how does one accurately measure skills like “AI literacy” or “creativity,” which are far more fluid and broader than knowledge in traditional subjects?
What Are the Next Steps?
Still, China’s structured approach has strong advantages due to its high socio-economic standing and centralized governance. This structure allows focused national investment in critical infrastructure like broadband, computer labs, and teacher training.
Ultimately, this is about empowering a generation to not just participate in the technological future but to help lead it. The time to learn from global pioneers and initiate a uniquely Nepalese transformation is right now.
Professional development programs can be scaled efficiently across the country, and pilot projects initiated in top-tier schools can be refined and expanded nationwide. Perhaps most importantly, China’s vast and interconnected education system, which serves over 200 million students, acts as a powerful amplifier; successful reforms in one region can rapidly influence others and even shape global standards.
For Nepal, the strategy must be different and deliberate. The path forward requires structured, iterative planning—beginning with comprehensive surveys, followed by careful piloting, continuous assessment, and gradual improvement.
The government must lead by collaborating with educational institutions and industry partners to create clear, practical guidelines. Seeking international cooperation from pioneering nations like China and Singapore is crucial to preparing youth to create and innovate with AI, not merely consume it.
Finally, public-private partnerships are essential to subsidize the necessary training and materials, ensuring that AI education becomes an equitably inclusive opportunity for all students.
Time to Revolutionize Education with AI
China has already positioned itself on the global map of education and innovation. For Nepal, the imperative is now to harness AI’s potential by strategically empowering its own human capital. In an era where job markets worldwide are being reshaped by new skill demands—with critical thinking and creativity at the forefront—AI education can no longer be treated as optional.
While mass layoffs may not yet be visible within Nepal, the indirect effects are clear: a shrinking demand for traditional entry-level roles and a visible shift in the types of jobs available.
Therefore, integrating AI into education is crucial not only to address Nepal’s persistent unemployment rate of around 11–12% but also to build a more resilient and innovative economy. A future-ready workforce skilled in AI could revolutionize key sectors like medical research, tourism, and agriculture.
Ultimately, this is about empowering a generation to not just participate in the technological future but to help lead it. The time to learn from global pioneers and initiate a uniquely Nepalese transformation is right now.
Comment