The global spotlight on China’s human rights abuses in Xinjiang has intensified following the United States government’s decision to blacklist more than two dozen Chinese companies for alleged use of forced labor.
With this addition, the total number of targeted Chinese firms has exceeded 100 now.
The move has assumed greater significance as it came shortly after the U.S. presidential elections, signaling a major diplomatic and economic blow to Beijing as President-elect Donald Trump prepares to assume office.
Other Western nations, including Canada, the United Kingdom, and members of the European Union, have taken similar steps to restrict trade with Xinjiang, signaling a coordinated effort to hold China accountable.
The international community’s response to forced labor in Xinjiang represents a significant setback for China, both diplomatically and economically.
The companies affected by the blacklist span a range of industries, producing goods such as polysilicon, textiles, and food products like tomato paste. With this development, these firms are now barred from selling their products in the United States.
The 2022 report by then U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Michelle Bachelet, cited indications of coercion and discrimination in labor and employment schemes linked to Xinjiang’s so-called “Vocational Education and Training Centers” (VETCs).
The decision has reignited global discussions about the use of forced labor in Xinjiang and raised concerns among Western lawmakers about goods originating from the region.
Experts stated that other nations would follow suit, imposing similar restrictions or bans on imports linked to forced labor in Xinjiang.
The US which has been raising issues pertaining to forced labour in Xinjiang had passed the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), a bipartisan bill aimed at blocking the import of goods made under such conditions into the United States.
This law has resulted in sanctions on numerous Chinese officials and companies complicit in labor and human rights abuses.
The UFLPA is part of broader U.S. efforts to hold China accountable for what multiple reports and investigations have described as crimes against humanity.
Leading human rights organizations, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have accused China of orchestrating a systematic campaign of oppression against Uyghurs and other predominantly Muslim ethnic groups in Xinjiang. Allegations include mass detentions, forced labor, and even genocide.
Beijing has vehement ally denied it even as growing evidence suggested that forced labor remains widespread in Xinjiang.
A 2023-2024 study, previewed by Politico, highlighted ongoing abuses in the region two years after a damning United Nations report brought the issue to light.
The research confirmed about the mass internment of Uyghurs and their exploitation in forced labor programs, ramping up pressure on the European Union to implement a bloc-wide ban on products made under such conditions.
Early this year, the Human Rights Watch released a 99-page document titled “Asleep at the Wheel: Car Companies’ Complicity in Forced Labor in China.”, exposed how global automakers, including General Motors, Tesla, Toyota, BYD, and Volkswagen, had failed to adequately assess and mitigate the risks of forced labor in their aluminium supply chains.
Some carmakers were found to have bowed to Chinese government pressure, applying weaker human rights standards at their joint ventures in China compared to their global operations.
The Financial Times revealed that Volkswagen, one of China’s best-selling foreign auto groups, faced significant challenges in adhering to internationally recognized social auditing standards such as SA8000.
The auditing process, conducted in collaboration with a Chinese firm, exposed gaps in transparency and adherence to human rights standards.
In June 2024, the Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) and the World Uyghur Congress (WUC) secured a ground breaking legal victory in the United Kingdom.
The Court of Appeal ruled that the National Crime Agency’s refusal to investigate imports of Uyghur forced labor cotton from China was unlawful.
The judgment has set a precedent for holding companies accountable for knowingly importing goods produced under forced labor conditions.
Under the UK’s Proceeds of Crime Act 2022, businesses could face prosecution if they fail to act on evidence of criminal labor practices in their supply chains.
This legal breakthrough has disrupted global supply chains, putting companies on notice that trading in goods linked to forced labor could result in severe legal and reputational consequences. It also marked the first successful legal action targeting Uyghur forced labor, reinforcing the growing momentum to combat these abuses at an international level.
Numerous studies and reports have provided compelling evidence of forced labor in Xinjiang.
For Beijing, the challenge will be not only to address these allegations but also to rebuild trust with the international community—a task that grows more difficult with each new revelation.
The 2022 report by then U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Michelle Bachelet, cited indications of coercion and discrimination in labor and employment schemes linked to Xinjiang’s so-called “Vocational Education and Training Centers” (VETCs).
These findings have been corroborated by several non-governmental organizations and research centers.
In 2020, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) published a detailed report on “Uyghurs for Sale: ‘Re-education,’ Forced Labour, and Surveillance Beyond Xinjiang.”
The report identified 83 foreign and Chinese companies benefiting from Uyghur forced labor through government-run labor transfer programs.
ASPI estimated that at least 80,000 Uyghurs had been transferred out of Xinjiang to work in factories producing goods for global supply chains in sectors such as electronics, textiles, and automotive manufacturing.
These findings have heightened pressure on multinational corporations to scrutinize their operations in China.
As more evidence of forced labor and human rights abuses in Xinjiang emerges, China faces growing isolation on the global stage.
The combination of sanctions, trade bans, and legal action underscores the international resolve to address these issues.
For Beijing, the challenge will be not only to address these allegations but also to rebuild trust with the international community—a task that grows more difficult with each new revelation.
Comment