KATHMANDU: Gagan Thapa, a leader of the Nepali Congress (NC) and Member of Parliament, has voiced strong objections to the government’s recommendation for amnesty resulting in the President’s pardon for individuals involved in serious crimes exploiting legal loopholes.
Thapa’s criticism was prompted by the recent amnesty granted to Yograj Dhakal, “Regal” from Banke, who had been imprisoned for the murder of Chetan Manandhar.
The decision to grant amnesty to Regal, which coincided with Constitution Day, has ignited public outrage.
Chetan’s widow, Bharati, has initiated a hunger strike in Maitighar Mandala, demanding Regal’s return to prison.
Addressing the House of Representatives during Thursday’s session, Thapa, who is also the General Secretary of Nepali Congress, emphasized the need to end the practice of exploiting legal ambiguities to secure amnesty.
He asserted, “Given that our Constitution and the laws enacted by it are now subject to misinterpretation, the responsibility of crafting effective legislation falls upon us.”
Thapa criticized the amnesty decision, noting that it has faced opposition in various forms, from the legislative floor to public protests and even legal challenges.
He demanded that the government provide an explanation to the House.
Thapa emphasized the government’s accountability, stating, “The government cannot evade responsibility after making such a decision; it must provide an answer for its actions.”
He also raised concerns about the widespread misuse of amnesty provisions and called for more stringent criteria based on a single law.
Thapa urged parliamentarians to revisit existing laws and incorporate amendments to prevent misinterpretations.
Thapa warned that without legislative corrections, further instances of controversial amnesty decisions might arise, suggesting that this issue warrants continued discussion.
“In this context, the Speaker should compel the government to respond and clarify the legal framework,” he insisted.
Lawmaker Thapa also stressed the importance of the state upholding legal rights and not undermining the trust of its citizens by failing to apply the law appropriately.
He emphasized that amnesty, as outlined in the law, must adhere to proper procedures.
Comment