KATHMANDU: Despite being in the ruling coalition together, CPN-UML Chairman KP Oli and Unified Socialist Chairman Madhav Kumar Nepal find themselves embroiled in a war of words.

The discord escalates, particularly regarding the formation of the government in Sudurpaschim province.

On April 19, Sudurpashcim Province Chief Najir Miya appointed Dirgha Sodari of the Unified Socialist as Chief Minister of the province.

Sodari asserted his claim with the backing of CPN-UML, the Maoist Centre, and the Nagarik Unmukti Party, alongside an independent lawmaker.

Earlier, when the UML and the Maoist Centre supported Nagarik Unmukti leader Kailash Chaudhary for Chief Minister, the Unified Socialist shifted allegiance towards the Nepali Congress, backing another Nagarik Unmukti lawmaker.

Chairman Oli criticized Madhav Nepal’s maneuver as departing from political norms, accusing him of siding with the Nepali Congress and disregarding the coalition’s decision.

In response, Unified Socialist leader Nepal accused the UML and Maoist Center of violating agreements made with their party.

He hinted at seeking alternatives, warning of potential shifts in power dynamics.

Nepal also condemned the use of KP Oli’s name in the Oli Gold Cup Cricket Tournament, emphasizing the importance of depoliticizing sports.

Subsequently, the UML expressed willingness to support Sodari for Chief Minister.

Adding to the friction, Unified Socialist Chair Nepal recently voiced skepticism about the stability of the ruling coalition, hinting at potential changes in alliances.

“The situation is complex. The alliance was formed hastily, leaving doubts about its sustainability,” remarked Nepal.

“The term of this alliance remains undecided. Our Prime Minister holds the answers. However, I can affirm that the situation is far from easy or comfortable.”

Discussions with Nepali Congress President Sher Bahadur Deuba have surfaced as Nepal explores alternative political arrangements.

Addressing the ongoing tension, Nepal reaffirmed his party’s commitment to autonomy, rejecting any form of coercion or manipulation from other coalition partners.